New Research Connects Ultra-Processed Foods to Higher Lung Cancer Risk, Even in Non-Smokers

A major European study has found a significant association between higher consumption of ultra-processed foods and an increased risk of developing multiple cancers, including lung cancer, even after accounting for major lifestyle factors like smoking. The findings, published in the peer-reviewed journal eClinicalMedicine, add to a growing body of evidence questioning the long-term health impacts of diets high in industrially formulated food products.

New Research Connects Ultra-Processed Foods to Higher Lung Cancer Risk

Key Fact	Detail
Primary Association	Higher intake of ultra-processed foods is linked to a greater risk of head, neck, and lung cancers.
Study Scope	Data was analyzed from 450,111 adults over an average of 14 years across 10 European countries.
Risk Magnitude	Every 10% increase in UPF consumption was associated with a notable rise in cancer risk, particularly for certain types.
Smoking Independence	The link between UPFs and lung cancer risk persisted even after researchers statistically adjusted for smoking status.

The Core Findings: A Closer Look at the Data

The new research, conducted by scientists at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the public health agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), analyzed dietary and lifestyle data from the European Perspective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. This large-scale study followed adults for approximately 14 years, documenting their dietary habits and health outcomes.

Researchers found that individuals with a higher proportion of ultra-processed foods in their diet had a greater likelihood of developing cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract, which includes the mouth, throat, and esophagus. The study also established a concerning link to lung cancer risk.

The study observed a consistent positive association between the consumption of UPFs and the risk of head and neck cancers and lung cancer. They noted that while obesity, a known consequence of high UPF intake, played a role, the association remained significant even after adjusting for body mass index (BMI). This suggests that other factors inherent to these foods may be contributing to the elevated risk.

What Are Ultra-Processed Foods?

Understanding the findings requires a clear definition of ultra-processed foods (UPFs). The term, derived from the NOVA food classification system, does not refer to all processed foods. It specifically describes industrial formulations made mostly or entirely from substances extracted from foods (like fats, starches, and sugars) or synthesized in labs.

Common examples include:

• Packaged snacks and cookies
• Sugary drinks and sodas
• Mass-produced breads and baked goods
• Instant noodles and soups
• Reconstituted meat products like chicken nuggets
• Frozen or ready-to-eat meals

“These products are characterized by their high energy density, elevated levels of added sugar, unhealthy fats, and salt, and a low content of dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals,” explained Dr. Fernanda Morales-Berstein, a lead author of the study, in a press release. This poor nutritional profile is a key aspect of the health concerns surrounding processed food consumption.

The Link to Lung Cancer, Independent of Smoking

Perhaps the most striking finding is the association with lung cancer independent of tobacco use. Smoking remains the leading cause of lung cancer globally. However, by statistically controlling for smoking history, alcohol consumption, and other known risk factors, the researchers isolated a potential dietary link. This suggests that components within ultra-processed foods themselves or the displacement of nutritious, whole foods in the diet could be a contributing factor. Experts hypothesize that chronic inflammation, chemical contaminants from packaging, or the presence of certain food additives could play a role, though these mechanisms require further investigation.

“While smoking and alcohol are the main risk factors for these cancers, our findings suggest that diet, and specifically UPFs, may also have an important role,” said Dr. Ines Huybrechts, a senior IARC scientist involved in the research.

Expert Reaction and Scientific Context

Independent experts have urged caution in interpreting the results, emphasizing that the study demonstrates an association, not a direct causal link. Cohort studies like this one are powerful for identifying patterns in large populations but cannot definitively prove that one factor causes another.

This is an important observational study that adds to the growing evidence of a link between ultra-processed foods and adverse health outcomes,” said Dr. Sarah Johnson, an independent nutritional epidemiologist not involved in the study. “However, it’s difficult to completely disentangle high UPF consumption from other broader unhealthy lifestyle patterns that may not have been fully captured in the data.” Previous research has already connected high processed food consumption with a higher risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. This new study strengthens the case that the impact of diet and health extends to cancer risk. The American Cancer Society recommends a diet rich in whole foods like fruits, vegetables, and whole grains to reduce cancer risk.

The findings underscore a need for public health policies that address the food environment, according to the study’s authors. They suggest that measures like front-of-pack nutrition labels, restrictions on marketing, and fiscal policies could help consumers make healthier choices. Future research will likely focus on identifying the specific biological mechanisms that could link UPFs to cancer. Understanding whether the risk comes from specific additives, contaminants from processing and packaging, or the overall lack of nutritional value will be critical for developing more targeted public health advice.

Cardiologists Recommend Plant-Based Foods for Optimal Heart Health, Citing Research