Arizona Considers Law Requiring Speeders to Install $250 Tracking Devices With Daily Fees
A proposed bill in Arizona is stirring debate over the future of traffic law enforcement. The legislation, introduced by Rep. Quang Nguyen (R-Prescott Valley), would allow judges to order tracking devices be installed in the vehicles of convicted speeders.
These devices would not only prevent the car from exceeding speed limits but also come with a daily fee of approximately $4, potentially adding up to $250 in installation fees. The bill aims to reduce high-speed driving while offering an alternative to license suspension.
Arizona Considers Law Requiring Speeders
| Key Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Device Installation Cost | Between $100 and $250 |
| Daily Fee | Approximately $4 per day for device usage |
| Bill Sponsor | Rep. Quang Nguyen (R-Prescott Valley) |
| Targeted Offenders | Drivers convicted of “super-speeding” or repeated speeding violations |
What’s Being Proposed?
Arizona lawmakers are considering a law that would allow the state to impose tracking devices on convicted speeders, which would limit their vehicles to posted speed limits. These devices, which cost between $100–$250 for installation, would come with a daily fee of $4 to maintain monitoring.
How the Tracking Devices Work
The proposed device works by using GPS technology to track the car’s speed. If the driver attempts to exceed the legal speed limit, the device will limit the car’s acceleration, effectively preventing them from speeding. If they try to drive over the speed limit, the device prevents the car from accelerating beyond a certain threshold, no matter how hard the driver presses the accelerator.
An Alternative to License Suspension
The legislation provides an alternative for drivers convicted of serious speeding offenses. Instead of having their licenses suspended, drivers may opt to install the device and continue driving legally, under the condition that they follow speed limits.
Why Arizona Is Pursuing This Proposal
Addressing High-Speed Driving
Excessive speeding is a significant concern for Arizona. In 2024, 417 traffic fatalities were recorded, with speeding accounting for a substantial portion of these deaths. Lawmakers have identified repeat offenders and “super-speeders” as key contributors to these accidents, and the tracking devices are viewed as a proactive tool to curb this dangerous driving behavior.
Rep. Quang Nguyen, who is sponsoring the bill, emphasized the importance of balancing safety with personal freedom. He noted that this bill gives convicted speeders a second chance while ensuring they adhere to safe driving practices. “This device allows people to stay productive while also keeping our roads safer,” Nguyen said in a statement.
The Role of Technology in Road Safety
The proposed law reflects a larger national trend of using technology to improve road safety. Similar speed-limiting devices are already used in parts of Europe, with notable success in Sweden and Norway. In these countries, Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) devices have been shown to significantly reduce speeding-related accidents. Arizona’s proposal follows this global trend by introducing a technological solution for speeding offenses.
Debate Over the Proposal
Support for the Bill
Advocates for road safety welcome the proposal, highlighting the effectiveness of technology in reducing speeding fatalities. Supporters argue that the devices could prevent dangerous high-speed driving, and some even suggest the technology could eventually become standard in all vehicles, much like seat belts or airbags.
James Peterson, a transportation safety expert, praised the bill, stating, “Speeding is a preventable problem, and with the right technology, we can drastically reduce the number of fatalities caused by speed-related crashes.”
Criticism and Concerns
However, the bill has not been without controversy. Privacy concerns have been raised by those who view the tracking devices as an intrusion into personal freedom. Critics argue that the constant monitoring of speed could lead to overreach by the government and unnecessary surveillance of drivers.
In addition, some lawmakers, like Rep. Rachel Keshel (R-Tucson), worry about the financial burden the installation fees and daily charges could place on low-income drivers. “If you can’t afford the device, do you simply lose your license and your ability to work?” Keshel asked during a committee hearing.
Privacy and Surveillance Concerns
The Question of Privacy
One of the main criticisms of the proposed law is the issue of privacy. While the technology could help enforce speed limits and prevent high-speed crashes, it also means that every movement of a vehicle could be tracked and monitored by the device. Critics argue that this could be seen as unwarranted surveillance, especially if the device collects more data than just the vehicle’s speed.
Addressing Privacy Concerns
To address these concerns, Rep. Nguyen assured that the data collected by the tracking devices would be strictly limited to speed enforcement and would not be used for other purposes, such as tracking location or driving patterns. There will also be oversight and restrictions on how long the data can be stored and who can access it.
How Arizona Compares to Other Regions
International Precedents
In countries like Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands, Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) systems are already in place, successfully reducing speeding and improving road safety. ISA has been implemented as a mandatory feature in new cars in many European countries and has been part of a broader strategy to improve road safety and reduce accidents.
The Arizona proposal is one of the first in the U.S. to focus on using speed-limiting technology specifically for criminal speeders, rather than a general mandate for all vehicles.
Related Links
It’s Official: Maryland Unleashes New “Super Speeder” Fines—Here’s How Much You’ll Pay
Potential Challenges in Implementation
While the technology holds promise, there are challenges that could arise in its widespread implementation:
- Device Malfunctions: Any malfunction or technical issue with the device could disrupt a driver’s ability to operate their vehicle normally, raising concerns about reliability.
- Costs of Technology: Though the upfront cost is relatively low, the daily fees may add up over time, making it a financial burden for some drivers, especially those from low-income communities.
Arizona’s proposed bill represents an innovative approach to tackling high-speed driving and improving road safety. By offering a technology-based solution that allows convicted speeders to continue driving legally, the state aims to balance public safety with personal freedom.
However, the proposal also raises important privacy, cost, and equity concerns, which will need to be addressed before the bill moves forward.
As the legislation proceeds through the state legislature, it will be interesting to see whether other states consider similar measures or whether technology-based enforcement will become a more widespread tool in managing traffic violations.
