Lawyers Seek $300 Million in Fees From the $1.5 Billion Anthropic Copyright Settlement

Lawyers representing authors in the historic class-action lawsuit against Anthropic have asked a U.S. federal court to approve $300 million in attorneys’ fees from the $1.5 billion Anthropic copyright settlement, one of the largest AI-related copyright payouts ever proposed.

The request marks a pivotal moment in the multiyear litigation over claims that Anthropic illegally trained its models on pirated books obtained from online “shadow libraries.”

$1.5 Billion Anthropic Copyright Settlement

Key Fact	Detail
Total Settlement Value	$1.5 billion
Requested Attorneys’ Fees	$300 million (20% of fund)
Additional Costs	$1.97M expenses, $17M reserve
Expected Author Payout	~$3,000 per eligible book (before deductions)
Hearing for Final Approval	Scheduled for April 2026

Why the $300 Million Request Matters in the Anthropic Settlement

In the newly filed motion, plaintiffs’ attorneys argue that the requested fee reflects the scope, risk, and complexity of the litigation. The case involved extensive data forensics, digital copyright tracing, expert analysis, and prolonged negotiations with Anthropic, one of the world’s fastest-growing AI firms.

The legal team claims more than 26,000 billable hours were required to pursue the case — a figure they say justifies a 20% fee, a number commonly approved in large technology-sector class-action settlements.

Industry Comparison

To support their request, attorneys referenced other megafund cases:

• Typical class-action attorney fees range from 20–33%.
• In tech-sector settlements, courts have approved similar percentages due to high litigation risk.
• Because AI copyright cases remain legally untested, attorneys argue that the risk of losing was substantial.

But critics say a $300 million fee risks reducing author compensation to a level inconsistent with the unprecedented scale of alleged infringement.

Background — How the Anthropic Copyright Case Reached a Landmark Settlement

The lawsuit — Bartz v. Anthropic PBC — accused the AI startup of using “shadow library” datasets containing hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books. Authors claimed these datasets were used to train Anthropic’s Claude models without permission or compensation.

Key Allegations Included:

• Systematic scraping of copyrighted books
• Use of pirated copies stored in foreign digital libraries
• Derivative outputs that mimicked authors’ styles
• Failure to license or obtain rights

Anthropic denied wrongdoing but agreed to settle while continuing to assert that its AI training processes fall under broad fair-use interpretations — a position still contested by many legal experts.

What Each Author Could Receive — And Why Reality May Differ

Preliminary estimates suggest authors may receive up to $3,000 per eligible book, but this figure applies only before deductions.

Deductions Include:

• $300M attorneys’ fees
• $17M administrative reserve
• $1.97M litigation expenses
• Potential $50,000 service awards to each named plaintiff
• Payment splits between authors and publishers

Once deducted, actual payouts may fall substantially.

Important Variables Affecting Individual Payments

• Whether the book is on the official “Works List”
• Whether rights are shared with publishers
• Number of total claimants
• Administrative overhead required to verify rights

Author advocacy groups warn that many writers will see significantly less than the advertised $3,000.

See more

AI copyright showdown: Apple sued after Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement https://t.co/qxonuh1kYe pic.twitter.com/zxBtc8FTsn

— CGTN (@CGTNOfficial) September 6, 2025

Who Is Included — And Who May Be Left Out from Anthropic Copyright Settlement

Verification Challenges

Rightsholders must submit a detailed Claim Form confirming ownership, licensing rights, and publication history. Many authors will need contracts, copyright registrations, or reversion letters — documents some may struggle to locate.

The Works List Issue

Some authors have criticized the process, reporting:

• Missing books
• Duplicate entries
• Incorrect rightsholder assignments
• Works listed under outdated publishers

One academic author told the Authors Guild that her book, which appeared in datasets used by AI systems, was not included in the final Works List because her publisher never submitted it.

Judges Scrutinize the Anthropic Copyright Settlement— Key Concerns Identified

Federal judges have raised questions during earlier hearings, including:

1. Lack of Clarity About Dataset Sources

While Anthropic agreed to destroy illegal datasets, the court demanded greater transparency around how they were obtained and used.

2. Fairness of the Distribution Formula

The court must determine whether the payout methodology treats all categories of authors equitably:

• nonfiction
• fiction
• academic texts
• translations
• collaborative works

3. Adequacy of Notification to Class Members

Some authors raised concerns they learned of the settlement only through media coverage, not through official notice.

4. Appropriateness of the Fee Request

Because legal fees directly reduce payouts, the court must evaluate whether:

• 20% is appropriate
• attorney hours are justified
• service awards are reasonable

A fairness hearing is set for April 2026, where these issues will be addressed.

What Legal Experts Are Saying About Anthropic Copyright Settlement

AI Legal Scholars

Experts at Stanford, MIT, and UCLA note this settlement could influence:

• future AI copyright frameworks
• training data governance
• international copyright reform

A senior lecturer at Stanford Law School commented:

“This may become the template for resolving AI copyright claims globally.”

Publishing Industry Analysts

Analysts warn of new tensions between authors and traditional publishers, especially over 50/50 payout splits.

Tech Industry Perspective

AI companies fear that high-cost settlements could:

• increase the price of model training
• reduce access to open datasets
• accelerate the shift to licensed data markets

What Happens Next — A Roadmap for Claimants

1. File Claims Early

Claim forms should be submitted well before the January 15, 2026 cutoff.

2. Confirm Rights Ownership

Co-authors and translated editions require additional documentation.

3. Monitor Court Updates

If the fee request is reduced, authors could receive more money.

4. Consider Opt-Out Options

Authors who reject the settlement terms may choose to pursue independent litigation.

Broader Implications — The Future of AI and Copyright

The Anthropic case is widely viewed as a legal turning point.

Potential Long-Term Effects:

• Stricter federal regulation on AI training datasets
• Increased licensing fees for book-based training corpora
• Pressure on AI firms to create transparent data lineage systems
• New international treaties to govern generative AI training

Global observers in the EU and UK have already cited this case in discussions of AI copyright legislation.

Related Links

$500 Monthly Support Now Extended Through 2026 — Check If You Can Qualify

Alert: Extra Social Security Payment Coming in December — But There’s a Catch

The request for $300 million in attorneys’ fees in the $1.5 billion Anthropic settlement has intensified debate over how to fairly compensate creators in the AI era. As the April 2026 fairness hearing approaches, the court’s decisions will shape not only author payouts but also the future legal landscape governing artificial intelligence, copyright, and data rights.

FAQs About Anthropic Copyright Settlement